可宥性事由：体育竞赛“越轨”行为出罪的又一考量因素     

刘峰江 《河北体育学院学报》2020,34(6):9-16

可宥性事由源于英美刑事诉讼中的可抗辩事由，与正当化事由联袂构成行为出罪理论的基石。与正当化事由不同，可宥性事由已经僭越了法定的行为正当化条件，行为的违法性首先被肯定，只是在责任归属上寻求宽恕性处理。引入可宥性事由，可丰富体育竞赛行为入罪和出罪的相关内容，便于司法统一判定。分析认为，体育竞赛行为可宥性事由成立，要满足体育赛事本身具有合法性和正规性、主体仅针对运动员、行为局限于体育竞赛行为、违法目的“单纯”性、行为以“反规则”为前提等条件。入罪和出罪的类型化有利于定罪和量刑的规范化，分别对竞技伤害行为、滥用兴奋剂行为、假球等竞赛舞弊行为适用可宥性事由予以出罪抑或减轻处罚的情形进行具体分析。最后，指出体育竞赛运动员可宥性事由行为入罪不能忽视运动员自由保障的理念，且尽量避免选择性刑事司法。  相似文献   

人与生产力     

刘世铨 《内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》1996,(1)

历史是通过人的活动创造的，历史又有着自己的规律，人是在自己意识支配下活动的，历史却并不完全遵照人的意识。马克思主义不到人以外寻找历史规律，却又把人置于历史规律即生产力发展进程之中。人是生产力的创造者，生产力又创造着人。  相似文献   

正义何以优先于效率——兼论罗尔斯的“正义原则”对我国制度改革的启示     

段江波 《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2006,38(3):80-85

正义与效率常作为评价社会制度合理性的关键词,罗尔斯经过严密论证表明了其"正义优先效率"的思想.他同时引进"差别原则"以结合"机会公平原则"尝试设计一个公正的社会体系以解决公平与效率的冲突.罗尔斯这种思想对现代中国的制度改革颇有借鉴意义.  相似文献   

Bringing the Law to the Library: The Importance of Librarian Mediation in Access to Justice Services     

Yolanda Patrice Jones 《Legal Reference Services Quarterly》2018,37(1):11-37

Library access to justice programs and services help people who need legal information and who cannot afford an attorney. Librarian mediation is a critical component in the provision of access to justice services. However, the value of library mediation, or assistance with using library resources, is often unrecognized, particularly where members of the public are trying to access electronic legal information sources, online legal forms, and other law technologies. This article will explore the role of librarians in providing access to justice services from the perspective of the work of Richard Susskind, which emphasizes technological approaches to providing legal services. While there is a place for technology in access to justice services, there is also a valuable role that librarians play in contributing to access to justice.  相似文献   

Restorative Practice in New Zealand Schools: Social development through relational justice     

Wendy Drewery 《Educational Philosophy and Theory》2016,48(2):191-203

This article proposes that restorative justice practices (RJPs), as used in New Zealand schools, are better understood as an instrument of social development than a behaviour management practice. Concerns about the achievement of Māori students are relocated, from an individualised psychological and pedagogical problem to an interdisciplinary context of historical and social development. Social constructionist theory is suggested as a lens through which RJPs in schools may be seen as the intentional production of respectful social relationships, rather than as behaviour management. A restorative process has the productive capacity to restore healthy relational functioning, both for those who have been offended against and those who have offended. It is argued that the primary function of restorative justice in schools is not about resolving specific conflicts, but rather, about the production and maintenance of respectful relationship, which is the antithesis of colonised relationship. Such a position reflects accountability on a communal, rather than individualised basis, and accords with recent moves in the United Nations Development Programme to look at Human Development as building agentive capacity.  相似文献   

The Development and Evaluation of the Intersectional Privilege Screening Inventory for Use With Counselors-in-Training     

Danielle A. Pester  A. Stephen Lenz  Joshua C. Watson 《Counselor Education & Supervision》2020,59(2):112-128

As counselor preparation programs are compelled to demonstrate student social and cultural competence, valid inventories are needed to measure development consistent with contemporary standards. The Intersectional Privilege Screening Inventory was created for this purpose, was assessed using 4 types of validity evidence, and has results supporting its use in student development.  相似文献   

论我国陪审制的缺陷及重塑     

陈云英  万丽丽 《安顺学院学报》2005,(2)

我国陪审制在我国遭遇了尴尬局面,陪审制是我国司法改革的一个重要方面,为了充分实现社会主义的司法公正,该制度在我国就有存在的必要性。作者首先阐述了我国陪审制的历史沿革,并分析其立法和司法上存在的缺陷。在立法上,该制度没有宪法和相关的法律依据;在司法上,陪而不审的现象严重。在此基础上,作者对重塑我国陪审制的对策进行了思考,提出了重塑我国陪审制度的方案。  相似文献   

和谐社会视野中的生态政治建设     

蒋俊明 《江苏理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2007,9(3):6-11

生态危机是人与自然、人与人关系的双重异化。和谐社会应当包括人与自然以及生态主义视野下的人与人的和谐，建设生态政治是构建现代和谐社会的必要内容。生态政治不仅着眼于目前生态问题的解决，更是实现发展可续和生态公正的政治保障机制。建立生态文化，建设生态政府以及发展基层民主政治是目前建设生态政治的路径选择，三个方面各有意义，又相互关联、相互促进。  相似文献   

The rhetorical force of “global archival memory”: (Re)Situating archives along the global memoryscape     

Matthew Houdek 《Journal of International and Intercultural Communication》2016,9(3):204-221

ABSTRACT

This essay engages the possibilities and pitfalls of UNESCO’s Memory of the World program for fostering “global archival memory.” Archives function as rhetorical weapons for both political control and social justice within national and regional contexts. The constitution of global archival memory shifts archives’ borders beyond nation-bound contexts, creating space for contention, deliberation, and debate within a presentist transnational arena. Approaching archives as symbols capable of marshaling cross-cultural identifications furthers memory scholars’ conceptions of transnational memories and communities. It responds to rhetorical scholars’ calls to further engage archives, while drawing on archival studies, memory studies, and rhetorical theories of memory.  相似文献   

The influence of heterogeneous exposure and pre-deliberation queries on pretrial publicity effects     

Jon Bruschke  Andrew Gonis III  Sarah A. Hill  Pam Fiber-Ostrow  William Loges 《Communication monographs》2016,83(4):521-534

Prior research on pretrial publicity has produced mixed results and a roughly equal number of studies show an effect, show no effect, or show mixed results. We explored the effects of (a) homogenous vs. heterogeneous exposure (whether deliberating jurors were all exposed to the same publicity or not) and (b) pre-deliberation queries as potential contributors to mixed results. We found an effect for positive but not negative publicity on conviction rates but not evidence ratings. Exposure heterogeneity appears to explain these differences and pre-deliberation queries did appear to play some role in the obtained outcomes. Overall these findings do not replicate a robust publicity effect and future research should consider how homogeneous exposure and pre-deliberation opinion queries influence results.  相似文献